Habitat dissimilarity and GuniFrac distances between the organizations were not correlated (Mantel test: nproducts = 15, ngroups = 6, r = ? 0.149, p = 0.553; late dry 2016: nsamples = 15, ngroups = 6, r = 0.008, p = 0.972; early dry 2017: nsamples = 21, ngroups = 7, r = ? 0.154, p = 0.561; late dry 2017: nsamples = 21, ngroups = 7, r = 0.064, p = 0.776; Table S8). The model examining the effects of habitat overlap and diet dissimilarities on groups' GuniFrac distances was also not significant (LMM II: ? 2 = 3.264, df = 2, p = 0.196, R 2 m/c = 0.08/0.98) (Table S9).
The 18S rRNA gene research of your own residential property flowers utilized in faecal samples revealed that at the very least in the down taxonomic accounts, we.age. before the members of the family level, diet didn't seem to apply to between-class variation in the microbiome constitution. Despite apparent between-group version inside dinner plant arrangements, groups' microbial microbiome configurations didn't reflect such differences when aesthetically inspecting the newest respective graphs (Fig. 2A, B). I discovered, not, regular weight reduction activities. In early deceased 12 months datingranking.net local hookup Madison WI both in analysis age, faecal trials consisted of the great majority away from vegetation throughout the family Combretaceae and Salicaceae, while within the late inactive 12 months Fabaceae and Sapindaceae was indeed consumed when you look at the greater quantity (Fig. 2B).
Beta variety: maternal relatedness
We examined the effects of maternal relatedness coefficients on GuniFrac distances among all individuals, i.e. between both, group members and individuals from different groups. The interaction between the relatedness coefficient and group membership (same or different) was not significant (likelihood ratio test comparing the model with and without the interaction: ? 2 = 0.105, df = 1, p = 0.746), which is why we excluded it from the model. Читать далее «Beta variety: habitat dissimilarity, environment overlap, and diet»